|
Author
|
Topic: Ollie Stench's Biased History of New Wave
|
Ollie Stench Admin Posts: 2386 Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 12-02-2002 02:22 PM
Ollie Stench’s Completely Biased and 100% Accurate History Of New Wave From 1977 – 2002 (v 1.0 Dec 2002)Ok, forget everything you think you know and listen up for I am the font of all New Wave Knowledge. Punk Rock™ started in 1976, in England, with the Sex Pistols. I know there was the Velvet Underground, The Ramones, The Stooges, and a million other bands that I could list off but for our lecture today we will say that Punk Rock™ started in 1976 with the Sex Pistols. When the Sex Pistols broke nationally and internationally they changed the face of popular music. They were considered “dangerous”, “subversive”, and “demonic creatures from the bowels of Hell”. They, along with other bands like The Clash, The Damned, Slaughter and the Dogs, The Raped etc were labeled “punk rock”. “Punk Rock” was a derogitory term and few of the original bands ever actually used that label to describe themselves or their music. The Industry (aka The Man, aka marketing executives) came up with the term “New Wave” to describe the new music being created. “New Wave” was much more palletable to the general public. Soon, however, the Punk Rock™ factionalized, one side schisming to the left with bandwagon jumpers cloning the Pistols or the Ramones and dumbing punk down to the bare necessities. The other side schisming off to the right with people who took the ideas and ideals of Punk Rock™ and adding other influences. The schism to the right was generally referred to as New Wave, as the left side had no problem calling themselves “punks”. You should already be familiar with the punk rock side of things as its been beaten to death by the media in the last 5 years. We’re gonna go down the right-hand path and see what became of the New Wave. The first thing you should know is that the label “New Wave” meant 2 completely different things in England and the States. In England New Wave referred to the first wave punk bands and their more intelligent offshoots (Elvis Costello, The Jam, Ultravox!, Bauhaus etc). In America New Wave meant bands that dressed funny and played synthesizers. But there was some commonality. Since I live in the States and that is where my viewpoint is taken from I’ll let a limey historian tell you about the Brit angle. New Wave™ as a genre pretty much started with Gary Numan. You can trace him back starting with Kraftwerk through suicide and arrive at early Human League and The Normal. But Numan was the first person to become a pop star with a predominantly synth-based sound. What made this possible was the availability of cheap keyboards. Until Moog came out with their “personal” synthesizers, electronic instruments were the realm of the Keith Emmersons, the Rick Wakemans, the Pink Floyds… boring old rockers who were rich enough to shell out the thousands of dollars necessary for a synthesizer the siaze of a refridgerator. Moog (and a few other companies like ARP and Roland) brought the cost down to about a grand, thus putting the technology in the hands of the kid on the street (theoretically). What this “new” technology did was to give the kid who wanted to play music but didn’t want to spend years learning an instrument a way to get the ideas out of her head and onto a stage. Like punk, this happened simultaneously all around the world, as a cheap synth in the US was also cheap in Spain, Norway, and Australia. For early synth-based New Wave bands check out DEVO, Eurythmics, The Human League, Visage, Ultravox (without the “!”), Kissing The Pink, Yaz, Depesche Mode and The Units. Now, there was another offshoot from Punk Rock™ that was also lumped under the New Wave™ umbrella. Bands that didn’t embrace the synthesizer, or who used them sparringly, like The Psychedelic Furs, Blondie, Echo and the Bunnymen, Joy Division, REM, The B-52’s, Bow Wow Wow and U2 were all making different music in the very late 70’s and very early 80’s. For lack of a better term they were also labeled New Wave™ and you could find records by those artists alongside the synth-based bands in the hipper record stores, even though Kim Wilde sounded nothing like Pylon, who sounded nothing like A Certain Ratio. In 1979 there was yet another offshoot that came to symbolize the image that most people conjur up when they hear the term New Wave™, that being of the skinny white guy wearing a white button-up shirt and a skinny necktie. This was the realm of Power Pop™, being high-energy bar rock based on 60’s R&B. The Plimsouls, The Beat, The Nerves, The Romantics and a million other Power Pop bands sprung up world-wide, but mostly in the US. These bands took the energy of punk rock and combined it with the vocal harmonies and subject matter (mostly singing songs about girls) of 60’s pop bands like the Raspberrys, The Kinks, and the like. Then you had the cross-pollenation effect with bands like Blondie and The Cars. Were they Power Pop? Were they Punk Rock? Were they fucked up art damaged psychos? Whatever, they were still called New Wave™ and the kids ate it up. The Thompson Twins, Duran Duran, A Flock Of Seagulls, while still firmly entrenched in the underground in the US, were bona fide pop stars in England, and if you went to the UK back then looking for those records the shopkeepers would have thought that you were buying the records for your 11 year old neice. Granted, later on Duran Duran became the biggest band since the Beatles, but even after Rio had been out for 6 months Duran was still pretty unknown in America. The same thing happened with a bleached-out bimbo named Madonna. Her first record was out for a year, getting heavy play at nightclubs and on dance-oriented college rock radio stations, before becoming “the next big thing”. New Wave™ as a genre pretty much died in about 1986. Sigue Sigue Sputnik being one of the only practitioners of the time. We have Rap and the very beginnings of House and Techno to thank for the demise of New Wave™. From there synth-based music was either found in the gay discos or in the “industrial” scene. However, starting in 2000 there has been a resurgence in 80’s sounding New Wave™. Slowly bands are trickling out of the woodwork proclaiming their love of the cheesy, bubbly synth stylings of Vince Clarke, Gary Numan, John Foxx and their ilk. New bands that actually get it right are Ladytron, Add N To (X), Fisherspooner, and The Epoxies. Who knows where this will lead, if anywhere? 1970’s Kraftwerk Can Neu! DEVO The B-52’s Human League Tubeway Army Nash The Slash 1980’s New Wave™ Soft Cell Human League Visage Classix Nouveaux A Flock Of Seagulls Gary Numan Icehouse Berlin Missing Persons 1980’s Power Pop™ Blondie The Plimsouls Paul Collins’ Beat The Go-Gos or any of the “Power Pearls” collections 1990’s there wasn’t shit 2000’s see the last paragraph of the lecture for further study please see the following links: http://www.nwoutpost.com/nwhist.html http://www.scathe.demon.co.uk/newro.htm
http://www.lexiconmagazine.com/NWC/complex/intro.html [This message has been edited by Ollie Stench (edited 12-02-2002).] IP: Logged |
lutefisk Punk Posts: 1379 Registered: Dec 2001
|
posted 12-02-2002 02:33 PM
Oh man...Icehouse. I'd forgotten about them. Cripes, they were great.IP: Logged |
stu Punk Posts: 299 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 12-02-2002 02:38 PM
As I much prefer the British new wave and I respect your encyclopedic knowledge on the subject, I would love to read your Yank ideas on the limey version of New Wave.I don't wish to insult but Blondie/Cars/Devo=zzzzz to me. Give me the Jam! IP: Logged |
Ollie Stench Admin Posts: 2386 Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 12-02-2002 03:03 PM
quote: Originally posted by stu: I would love to read your Yank ideas on the limey version of New Wave.
That will have to wait for a future revision. This is completely a work-in-progress, and something that took me about 20 minutes to whip up. quote:
I don't wish to insult but Blondie/Cars/Devo=zzzzz to me. Give me the Jam!
While I'm not a big fan of the Jam I do like the obvious hits. Personally I can't fucking stand the Cars, Rick Ocasek in particular. But I am trying to be all-encompassing, and like them or not, The Cars were part of New Wave history. Same with REM, I hate them with a passion (aside from Radio Free Europe, thats a good song), but they represent a side of what was catagorized as New Wave that alot of people forget about.
IP: Logged |
stu Punk Posts: 299 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 12-02-2002 03:17 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ollie Stench: Soon, however, the Punk Rock™ factionalized, one side schisming to the left with bandwagon jumpers cloning the Pistols or the Ramones and dumbing punk down to the bare necessities. The other side schisming off to the right with people who took the ideas and ideals of Punk Rock™ and adding other influences. The schism to the right was generally referred to as New Wave, as the left side had no problem calling themselves “punks”.You should already be familiar with the punk rock side of things as its been beaten to death by the media in the last 5 years.
Stupid question... Are you referring to hardcore here?
IP: Logged |
Ollie Stench Admin Posts: 2386 Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 12-02-2002 03:28 PM
Not really, HC came later. More of the original Oi! scene (Business, Cockney Rejects etc) and plain old punk bands like Anti Nowhere League, Vice Squad, One Way System etc.And I didn't want that to sound like a put-down as I love all that shit just as much as I love the New Wave stuff. But the history of punk has been well documented, almost to the point of overkill. IP: Logged |
MO Punk Posts: 711 Registered: Oct 2001
|
posted 12-02-2002 04:13 PM
Good going, Ollie.Methinks Blondie should be in the 70's, tho. I also thought that the guy from Sire records who signed Blondie, etc., early on came up with the term "new wave." Seymour Stein? That's the name that's coming into my mind... What about our old faves the Vapors? I think that you could also include early Joe Jackson, Elvis Costello and one of my faves Lene Lovich. Also, Iggy's New Values I consider a new wave record. I have a book at home called "The New Music" I shall consult... And Adam and the Ants? [This message has been edited by MO (edited 12-02-2002).] IP: Logged |
mathew Lil Punk Posts: 13 Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 12-02-2002 04:25 PM
i read somewhere that malcolm mclaren (sp?) laid claim to inventing the "new wave" tag.IP: Logged |
trainwreck Punk Posts: 821 Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 12-02-2002 04:38 PM
"I have excellent news for the world, there is no such thing as new wave.It was the polite thing to say when you wanted to say you were not into the boring old rock and roll but you didnt dare to say punk because you didnt want to get kicked out of the party and no one would give you coke anymore..." Kickboy FaceIP: Logged |
MO Punk Posts: 711 Registered: Oct 2001
|
posted 12-02-2002 09:46 PM
Okay, I've pulled out one of my history books:The New Music, Glenn A. Baker & Stuart Coupe C1980 This is my list based on the book. England: Pretenders Elvis Costello The Boomtown Rats Joe Jackson Lene Lovich UK Squeeze (later Squeeze) The Tourists (pre Eurythmics) The Police Bram Tchaikovsky Wreckless Eric Interview John Cooper Clarke US: The Motels DEVO B-52s The Knack Pearl Harbour and the Explosions The Cretones The Dickies Blondie The Shirts Urban Verbs The Fools Sue Saad and the Next The Feelies The Go-Gos Holly and the Italians Powerpop, according to the book: The Records (remember Starry Eyes?) The Shoes Pezband 20/20 Kirsty MacColl Bettie Bright The Jags Ian Gomm The Beat The Romantics The Rubinoos Eric Carmen Paley Bros. Nick Lowe
Synthesiser/Electronic, according to book: Talking Heads The Flying Lizards John Foxx Gary Numan M The Human League Throbbing Gristle (!) Telex That's all I can deal with right now... IP: Logged |
Chelsea40ozBondage Punk Posts: 2284 Registered: May 2000
|
posted 12-02-2002 11:33 PM
Good thread Ollie. MO, you got me to thinking... My mommy got me this book: by Liz Thompson, Philip Kamin [1982, reprint 10/92] "The lives and careers of more than seventy women rock stars of the day, with photos. This book was released to compliment a video of a simliar content. The video however only came out in Germany at that time as 'Women in Rock', later released in the UK and US as 'Girls Bite Back'. This book was published by Omnibus Press in 1982. They're all in here: Siouxsie, Debbie Harry, Patti, Kate Bush, Chrissie Hynde, Joan Jett, Nina Hagen, Toyah, Annie Lennox." May I also mention Poly Styrene was included in the book. You can still find copies online. My mom also bought me "the book of looks" with some boring fashions, like preppy, but they had spreads on punk rock and new romantic. I still use the makeup tips.  I have an extra copy of "The Punk Rock / New Wave Explosion". Anyone interested?
------------------ C40 C40 C40 GO! IP: Logged |
Ollie Stench Admin Posts: 2386 Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 12-03-2002 01:58 AM
2 books that are invaluable resources for New Wave info. As I stated above, this is a work in progress and should not be viewed as a "finished product". I'm actually thinking about turning it into a fully-interactive web page. Like I don't have enough shit to do already... IP: Logged |
crumbly Punk Posts: 41 Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 12-03-2002 04:05 PM
I've got tickets to see Soft Cell on Friday in SF. Haven't decided what to wear yet....IP: Logged |
Swillmongrel Punk Posts: 730 Registered: May 2000
|
posted 12-03-2002 04:09 PM
I'm pretty sure DEVO was around and doing their thing (whether or not it was put out as major lable output) before the Sex Pistols came about.IP: Logged |
Pete Scholtes Punk Posts: 329 Registered: Dec 2001
|
posted 12-06-2002 01:13 AM
I like that you make the distinction between UK and U.S. New Wave. When I was a kid, it was all New Wave to me if it was on MTV (which arrived on Madison cable as soon as it started). Pere Ubu were punk to me because I'd never heard of them before seeing 'em on NightFlight.Since that time, I've collected a few stray and unconnected clues about the origins and semantics of this hairdo, I mean genre, which complicate my understanding somewhat: -- Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers (!) were the first American band (Petty claims) to be called New Wave. -- Many pre-hardcore L.A. bands like the Go-Go's considered themselves punk. But when punk bands started getting banned from clubs, the "new wave" tag caught on for bands hoping to actually play in public. (It's all explained in various books, and in a different way on CHIPS, the punk episode, which favored the more "positive" influence of new wave. Keep in mind, I have spent only 24 hours of my life in L.A..) -- At some point, and I don't know when (see above), L.A. punk bands that weren't hardcore started being called "new wave" if they featured synthesizers or appeared on MTV. Those that didn't do either, but never sounded like hardcore (Fishbone?) never got labeled that way. -- Then a lot of hardcore went in different directions, too, and it was simply called posthardcore, right. All the SST L.A. bands, for instance. -- Backing up a bit, all the CBGB's bands, like Talking Heads and Blondie, called themselves "punk" so far as I know. (I'm not a New Yorker, either.) They were only new wave to tikes like me who consumed them on MTV. -- The British-American paradox: Generation X's "Dancing With Myself" was punk; Billy Idol's "Dancing With Myself" was New Wave. Discuss. -- Then in the breath it took to say "1983," new wave took on a different life as fashion and fad among kids, especially girls, who liked some punk as music (along with Madonna and Eurythmics and Culture Club) but didn't look especially punk. Then again, a lot of punk girls liked those fashions, too. There were mohawks with fusia jelly shoes and aqua short dresses, so far as I remember. Let me dwell on that image for a second before moving on... -- Ultimately, fashion was what killed the genre title, don't you think? The hair became embarassing. "Hey, Flock of Seagulls!" Remember New Wave Hookers?
IP: Logged |
Pete Scholtes Punk Posts: 329 Registered: Dec 2001
|
posted 12-06-2002 01:17 AM
-- One last quibble: Your statement blaming the demise of New Wave on rap and house loses me. The same girls singing "Save a Prayer" in my freshman high school French class liked the Fat Boys in 1984. (Run-DMC and the Beasties might have ushered in a kind of cool that was not exactly Kajagoogooesque, but they didn't really become huge until '87, right?)Also, house music was massive in '88, but still almost entirely underground, and that was pretty well after New Wave died. "It Takes Two" was the pop exception for both rap and house, but it was battling hair metal, not New Wave. I just think most American music (punk included) lost momentum in '86. Rap and house came in to fill the void. If they killed New Wave, it was a Kavorkian gesture.
IP: Logged |
Ollie Stench Admin Posts: 2386 Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 12-06-2002 01:57 AM
quote: Originally posted by Pete Scholtes: -- Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers (!) were the first American band (Petty claims) to be called New Wave.
I actualll have a bootleg comp lp called The Whitman Punk Sampler. On it among The Pistols, Damned, Iggy, and Patti Smith, is Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers! quote: -- Backing up a bit, all the CBGB's bands, like Talking Heads and Blondie, called themselves "punk" so far as I know.
Blondie, as early as 1977, were claiming to be a power pop band. Then they covered "Hanging On The Telephone" by The Nerves. quote:
-- The British-American paradox: Generation X's "Dancing With Myself" was punk; Billy Idol's "Dancing With Myself" was New Wave.
the PERFECT example of the difference between UK and US New Wave. quote: Let me dwell on that image for a second before moving on...
Peter, my friend, you have given me somehting to dream about on this chilly December night. Thank you! quote: One last quibble: Your statement blaming the demise of New Wave on rap and house loses me.
What I meant was that rap and house is where electronic music went post-1986. House was still very underground, yes, but within a few years it would completely eclipse the New Wave influence on electro music. quote: I just think most American music (punk included) lost momentum in '86. Rap and house came in to fill the void. If they killed New Wave, it was a Kavorkian gesture.
I could not agree more. "Underground" music in the span from 86-93 really blew chunks. No one was inventive, creating new styles, it was just aping the previous musical generation (a musical generation, in Ollie's World, is about 3-4 years). WHEW!!! Enough quoting for 1 post! BUT... I would like to thank everyone for their input on this thread. Hopefully, eventually, it will end up as a web site complete wiht pics and mp3's. IP: Logged |
Chelsea40ozBondage Punk Posts: 2284 Registered: May 2000
|
posted 12-06-2002 11:03 AM
quote: Originally posted by Pete Scholtes: -- Many pre-hardcore L.A. bands like the Go-Go's considered themselves punk. But when punk bands started getting banned from clubs, the "new wave" tag caught on for bands hoping to actually play in public. (It's all explained in various books, and in a different way on CHIPS, the punk episode, which favored the more "positive" influence of new wave. Keep in mind, I have spent only 24 hours of my life in L.A..)
A possibly boring sidenote. I met a few old school LA people when I lived in New Orleans (among lots of other people from everywhere). I showed Don Bolles around for a night or two, I met Trudy at Mardi Gras, and I used to hang out with this girl very much my senior, of the band The Rude Girls ("Shin-o-be" -- gaelic sp?) Anyway I was told that the Rude Girls, the Germs and some other bands shared a practice space and as a favor to their friends, the GoGos, they let them use the space gratis cos they were broke. Once the GoGos "hit it big" they would cruise around in their limos. When old friends would wave, they were completely ignored. Basically the band allegedly snubbed the very people who helped them get their start as musicians. This is not something I read in a book, I was told this by people who were there. So it's hearsay, I doubt it was fueled by jealosy, as it seemed to be an independent consensus and I think it may be documented elsewhere. The hearsay may have made it into print then. Whatever. But that does not sound to me like a very punk thing to do.
IP: Logged |
zomzom Punk Posts: 77342189 Registered: Mar 1920
|
posted 12-06-2002 01:44 PM
DEVO started in 1974, but was more art damage noise stuff in those days, but if you listen to the live recording they made at a halloween party in that year, you can tell that they pissed off the stoned hippy crowd quite nicely. Ollie, you failed to mention the importance of the Ska revival in New Wave. I spent the summer of '80 in London, and the ska thing was huge. Even by then, Punk in the UK was mainstream, I remember hearing Anarchy in the UK playing in a drugstore muzak system. Gary Numan probably was the originator of what became a New Wave genre, the electronic mechanical beat set to a good pop song, The Tubeway Army stuff is excellent. I rode the fence between '77 and '81 or so as to considering myself New Wave or Punk. I know, it's quite silly, but if you were a music fan back then it seemed sooo important. I regularly alternated between the skinny tie outfit and the King's Road bondage gear, depending on what band I was going to see. In London, it was a uniform and could make the difference between getting beaten up or having a good time. Well, admittedly some people's idea of a good time involved beatings. Yeah, Tom Petty was quite erroneously called new wave, probably closer to power pop, which he was also called. I remember AC-DC even being considered New Wave! As far as I'm concerned, New Wave died around '82, when hardcore was starting to catch on. Any of the stuff considered new wave after that really isn't new wave, it's just rock or pop. Gen X's Dancing with Myself was lite-punk, and of course I liked it. Billy Idol doing it was NOT new wave, it was just rock and roll. Billy Idol solo has never been new wave. The Cars, like them or not, ( I love them ), were probably the biggest early influence on lots of new-wavish bands, don't forget that their first album came out in '78! Hearing that first chunka-chunka guitar riff from You're Just What I Needed on the radio back then as opposed to all the horrid crap that was being played sure sounded great. Same with The Knack's My Sharona, a really great pop song that sounded cool on an AM car radio. I look forward to more New Wave input here, I've been consistently listening to that stuff for years and I like lots of it better than the "punk" stuff, especially Hardcore. Besides, the fashion was much better.  IP: Logged |
Finn McCool Punk Posts: 500 Registered: Jul 2002
|
posted 12-06-2002 01:51 PM
"No-no, not Punk. New Wave. Totally different head. Totally." --Johnny SlashIP: Logged |
Pete Scholtes Punk Posts: 329 Registered: Dec 2001
|
posted 12-06-2002 07:07 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ollie Stench: I could not agree more. "Underground" music in the span from 86-93 really blew chunks. No one was inventive, creating new styles, it was just aping the previous musical generation.
Hate to snatch more quibbles from the jaws of agreement, but for me the big exceptions in 1986 were Beat Happening and Sonic Youth (and in 1987, Fugazi). But they didn't really have a pervasive cultural impact until late in the decade. I consider the "international pop underground" they spawned, along with riot grrrl, to be a significant new thing, pre-1994.
IP: Logged | |